Implementing Economic Constitutionalism

You can help implement EconStitutionalism by either donating yourself, or sending other donors to this page:

Go Fund Me

What is EconStitutionalism?

EconStitutionalism—short for Economic Constitutionalism—is a new approach for applying constitutional checks and balances to monetary economics. Specifically, to competing, decentralized currencies within both businesses and communities. Some might describe it as Next Generation Capitalism because it retains private ownership of capital and the means of production. But for some people, the word capitalism carries considerable historical and political baggage, including associations with problems EconStitutionalism is specifically designed to address. EconStitutionalism therefore asks to be evaluated on its own merits rather than through assumptions inherited from existing or prior forms of capitalism.

EconStitutionalism includes organizing businesses and communities into Constitutional Business Alliances (CBAs), with their own Value-Linked Currencies (VLCs) designed to maintain close correspondence between value creation and the quantity of currency issued. EconStitutionalism also includes a new understanding of markets, liquidity, and ownership, referred to as Ownership Exchange Infrastructure (OEI). Together, CBAs, VLCs, and OEI are the three principal components through which the principles of EconStitutionalism are developed and applied. You can read more about EconStitutionalism below and in White Paper WP101.

Three components. One design.

Constitutional Business Alliances (CBAs) provide the governance layer—the constitutional architecture that keeps decentralized systems fair, transparent, and accountable. They apply constitutional checks and balances directly over economic decision-making so no single actor can dominate, distort, or unfairly extract value from the system. But governance alone cannot produce wealth. Without a trusted currency to measure achievement—and without a free market to define, recognize, and exchange ownership—CBAs, like  some constitutions themselves, would be nothing more than beautifully designed decision frameworks. Their real power emerges only when paired with VLCs, which quantify achievement, and OEI, which legitimizes and transfers the resulting value. Together, they create an ecosystem where governance doesn’t merely regulate economic activity—it activates it.

Value-Linked Currencies (VLCs) transform currency from a political instrument into a measure of real, verifiable achievement. If money is  truly liquid human achievement, then VLCs are the first monetary systems designed on that definition. Unlike fiat currencies—where issuance is detached from value creation—VLCs issue new units only when new value has been proven. They capture value at the granular level where it actually appears: the business, the project, the community, the contribution. Yet VLCs cannot function alone. They depend on CBAs to validate achievement, resolve disputes, and ensure integrity in issuance. And they rely on OEI to define ownership, track rewards, and ensure those rewards can move freely across markets. A VLC without a CBA is a system without trust. Both must operate together for a truly decentralized economy.

Ownership Exchange Infrastructure (OEI) is a previously unnamed yet essential characteristic of every functioning market system. It is the underlying institutional framework that enables markets to operate. Without explicitly naming OEI himself, Hernando de Soto famously illustrated its importance in The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, showing that prosperous economies succeed because they possess clear, enforceable systems of ownership—while struggling economies often lack them. At its core, OEI defines what can be owned, who owns it, and how ownership transfers occur. When OEI is missing or unclear, societies face stalled development, resource mismanagement, and the familiar Tragedy of the Commons. OEI quietly enables both VLCs and CBAs, anchoring the ownership rights and transfer mechanisms that allow the entire system to function.

Can the U.S. dollar be saved?

Yes, definitely—but only if we understand what the dollar actually represents. For more than a century, we have expected a single currency—the U.S. dollar—to represent virtually every form of economic value in the nation. That burden has become too great. The solution is not one currency attempting to measure everything, but many competing decentralized currencies, each representing distinct categories of value alongside the U.S. dollar. In short, the dollar can be saved—but only by sharing that burden.

Milton Friedman correctly observed that inflation is “too many dollars chasing too few goods.” That describes an imbalanced equation. To restore balance, we can either reduce the number of dollars or increase the amount of value those dollars are chasing. However, this overlooks much of what creates real economic value. In the modern economy, countless valuable and value-producing assets—far beyond physical goods—escape representation by the dollar or any other currency. Safe communities, excellent schools, trustworthy institutions, productive technologies, intellectual property, efficient organizations, and other forms of real wealth are rarely measured directly, yet they increase prosperity and purchasing power. Their existence helps explain why inflation has not been far more damaging already.

By assigning a new species of currency—a Value-Linked Currency (VLC)—to represent each category of this unmeasured value, the aggregate wealth of the economy increases because the measured supply of value expands—represented through decentralized VLCs. And unlike traditional monetary reform, this solution does not require government action: VLCs can be created privately, just as other cryptocurrencies already are, allowing industries and communities to represent their own value while contributing voluntarily to a more resilient monetary system.

By unburdening the dollar and representing such value through VLCs, we can begin the transition to a constitutional hard-asset dollar again—and do so safely, without the economic collapse that many predict would accompany a sudden return to the gold standard. VLCs create a gradual, market-driven transition that stabilizes rather than shocks the system.

 

What is Money?

At the core of our financial systems—and at the root of capitalism’s most persistent problems—are the regulations and infrastructure surrounding the money supply. Inflation steals value from those who can least afford the loss and rewards new units of currency to those who have not actually created new value. The inherent unfairness is felt by everyone and is a major reason capitalism is so often blamed for problems actually caused by the way money is structured. But what is money? We must answer that question before we can hope to prevent the unfairness and halt the theft.

MONEY IS LIQUID HUMAN ACHIEVEMENT

It is the measurable reflection of productive, beneficial human work—made liquid—so it can flow through an economy. Knowing this, we can and should create systems that accurately measure its creation and fairly reward human contribution—based on one of the oldest principles of monetary economics: the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM).

The Significance of U2D2

U2

The U2 in U2D2 stands for Marginal Utility Theory 2.0. It does something economics has never done before—it unifies how value is created, how value is perceived, and how value is measured in currency.

In the late 1800s, the Marginal Utility Revolution reshaped economics. Thinkers like Carl Menger, William Stanley Jevons, and Léon Walras shifted the focus from objective costs—such as labor or raw materials—to subjective value: what a good or service is worth to an individual at the margin. This reframing launched modern microeconomics and transformed how we understand value, price, and exchange. Yet despite its power, Marginal Utility Theory was never integrated with the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM). Not until now.

U2 unifies the subjective theory of value—most closely associated with Carl Menger and the Austrian school of economics—with the quantity theory of money—initially described in 1517 by Nicolaus Copernicus, later refined by Milton Friedman and the Monetarists. The Monetarists’ equation of QTM—MV = PQ—revealed how money supply, velocity, and economic output interact. U2 stands on the shoulders of both revolutions—linking marginal utility with a monetary system capable of aligning currency supply to real value creation.

U2 also recognizes a truth every successful business understands: value must be viewed from both perspectives—Expenses and Revenue.

  • Expenses reflect the cost of production, the lens of the Classical School, which sought to explain value through labor, capital, and inputs.

  • Revenue reflects subjective value, the insight of the Austrian School and the Marginal Utility Revolution, which showed that people—not inputs—ultimately determine what something is worth.

Profit—the difference between expenses and revenue—is the signal that connects these two traditions. It reveals where objective value creation has occurred. Profit drives rising standards of living and underwrites all material progress. It is the clearest measure of new value and should be celebrated. Each business thereby becomes a node where wealth is produced, measured, and rewarded.

Value creation is the living foundation of a dynamic, decentralized economy—where economic insight meets structural innovation. It is here that U2 and D2 converge.

D2

The D2 in U2D2 represents Decentralization 2.0. For most of modern history, centralized institutions controlled governance, finance, and the flow of information—systems built for a slower, less connected world. Power accumulated in banks, bureaucracies, and broadcast media. Then the digital age arrived and broke open the bottleneck. Peer-to-peer networks, the open internet, and later blockchain technologies began dismantling old gatekeepers, allowing information and value to move freely for the first time. Decentralized information became not only viable, but preferred.

D2 pushes this revolution further—embedding decentralization not just in technology, but in the architecture of value creation itself. Within U2D2, D2 activates a new class of decentralized systems: governance that resists capture (CBAs), currencies that reflect real value instead of political discretion (VLCs), and transparent ownership frameworks that keep markets honest (OEI). This is not decentralization as a slogan. It is decentralization engineered for verifiability, resilience, and systemic fairness—the trust layer of EconStitutionalism.

Traditional systems rely on trusting people with centralized power. U2D2 does something different: it builds systems where trust emerges from transparency, decentralization, and verifiable rules—what crypto pioneers call “trustless” systems. But make no mistake: trust is still the end goal. What changes is how trust is earned.

D2 redefines that process. In a decentralized framework, trust is established through contribution, not decree. Currency isn’t minted by fiat and handed to the well-connected; it is issued to those who demonstrably create value. Only decentralized governance, operating close to the point where wealth is produced, can measure and reward contribution with precision. Trust grows through transparency, consistent incentives, and a repeatable pattern of fair sharing of new wealth.

Returning now to the topic of QTM, this is why economists struggled unsuccessfully to implement it in a centralized model. New value can only be measured accurately and rewarded fairly in a decentralized system. U2 must be integrated with D2.